What are the chances that a text will be left without interference if it attempts to stand alone?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• If a text attempts to stand alone, it will almost certainly attract commentary or interference.hypothesis0.903
  Predicts the inevitability of dialogic intrusion upon any statement.
• How might the text behave otherwise?question0.795
  Opens up imaginative alternatives to conventional layout.
• The familiarity of the text block renders its conventions almost invisible.claim0.776
  Points out how deeply internalized layout norms become naturalized and unnoticed.
• When a text purports to be in dialogue with another text, can both be themselves or are they an other entity?question0.776
• What if nothing can ever be parallel in textual practice?question0.770
  Probes the impossibility of true parallelism, challenging the concept.
• Format does not determine reading but does structure the possible intervention.claim0.764
  Distinguishes between control over reading and enabling/disabling interpretative moves.
• Rather than falling silent at the limits of formal language, the paper chose to articulate what can be articulated and make explicit the boundary of what cannot.claim0.760
  Explicit closing methodological stance regarding the outer boundary of formal language.
• What makes one text long for another, arrange for an approach, strategize intimacies?question0.753
  Personifies texts and asks about their desirous relational drives.