Rather than falling silent at the limits of formal language, the paper chose to articulate what can be articulated and make explicit the boundary of what cannot.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• "The boundary is the medium through which all evidence flows, but it is not itself evidenceable."quote0.806
  Pithy statement of the core impossibility result in its first-person experiential implication
• We shall only be able to reproduce versions and combinations of what can be 'reached' by that form language.quote0.794
  States that the form language delimits what buildings can be created.
• In some sense, this is the simplest language model we profoundly don't understand. And so it makes a natural target for our paper.quote0.788
  Articulates why a one-layer transformer with MLP is the appropriate starting target for mechanistic interpretability
• What hasn’t been said? What still could be made explicit?question0.786
  Points to the shadow text of latent content.
• Notes are always elements of dialogue, as are marginalia and other commentary.claim0.786
  Inserts an ongoing conversation into the textual space.
• "This will simply be another 'finger pointing at the moon,' in a language that might provide a generative bridge between the contemplative and scientific domains of inquiry."quote0.786
  Frames the paper's epistemic status and intent; invokes the traditional Buddhist metaphor to situate the formal model
• When people think about what is needed to give them surroundings in which life can be lived, they CAN articulate itclaim0.783
  Optimistic statement about the latent capacity of ordinary people to express their deepest needs
• If a text attempts to stand alone, it will almost certainly attract commentary or interference.hypothesis0.775
  Predicts the inevitability of dialogic intrusion upon any statement.