Perfect parallelism is impossible in textual practice; hierarchy always emerges through spatial means

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The impossibility of true parallelism in textual practiceconcept0.826
  Claim that no two texts can occupy truly equal positions; hierarchy always emerges despite attempts at equality.
• What if nothing can ever be parallel in textual practice?question0.795
  Probes the impossibility of true parallelism, challenging the concept.
• We hypothesize that a similar 'brutal' and purely geometric process always occurs somewhere in other kinds of unfolding that generate living order — in poetry, dance, social structure, planning, and family relationships.hypothesis0.790
  Extends the brutal geometry thesis beyond architecture into all creative and social domains; acknowledged as not yet confirmed with certainty
• Parallelism (Impossible)claim0.778
• Parallel programming needn't be terribly difficult, but 'thinking in simultaneities' as in message-passing is calculated to make it difficult.claim0.778
  Asserts that Linda's uncoupled style reduces cognitive load.
• Objects in and of themselves do not help with parallelism.claim0.773
• Parallel sub-tasks within skills and across skill families should produce parallel outputs for legibility.claim0.769
• The discovery of perfect abstract equality representations that cannot be decomposed into entity representations is a foundational result informing our understanding of how symbolic and connectionist architectures coexistclaim0.765
  Concluding claim about theoretical significance of the hierarchical equality finding.