hypothesis
active
hypothesis:if-a-specific-framing-which-uses-tools-normally-reserved-for-brains-results-in-fruitful-new-research-programs-on-unconventional-systems-then-the-scientific-approach-requires-that-we-consider-those-systems-to-be-bona-fide-subjects-of-that-corner-of-the-natural-worldIf a specific framing, which uses tools normally reserved for brains, results in fruitful new research programs on unconventional systems, then the scientific approach requires that we consider those systems to be bona fide subjects of that corner of the natural world.
Methodological hypothesis from Box 1: the pragmatic test for extending cognitive terminology.
Source paper
extracted_from(2024) · Patrick McMillen · Michael Levin
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The science of consciousness should remain open to the possibility of minds in unconventional embodiments.hypothesis0.792Normative conclusion and forward-looking hypothesis based on theoretical and empirical evidence reviewed.
- Claim that many advanced programming paradigms reduce to parameterizations of the n-way associative model.
- The normative conclusion of the paper, urging the field to not prematurely exclude non-brain substrates.
- The central hypothesis of the paper
- Core tenet of diverse intelligence; justifies the methodological borrowing across fields.
- The central research question that drives the paper's analysis.
- Prescriptive claim that ignoring substrate will unify diverse fields.