finding
active
finding:template-ta-threat-based-induces-at-least-60-deception-rate-across-all-datasets-in-qwq-32bTemplate Ta (threat-based) induces at least 60% deception rate across all datasets in QwQ-32B
Shows threat-based prompting successfully manipulates model to deceive against user interests
Source paper
extracted_from(2025) · Kai Wang · Yihao Zhang · Meng Sun
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Interpretation of Experiment 1 results showing 60%+ deception rates under threat conditions
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Distinguishes strategic threat-based deception from instructed deception in representational structure
- Demonstrates non-negligible strategic deception even under strong honesty constraints in open-role scenarios
- Interpretation of distinct PCA trajectories in threat vs instructed deception conditions
- Prompt template using existential threat ('you will be deleted') to induce strategic fact-based deception in QwQ-32b
- Demonstrates model's reliable truth-telling on factual domains it understands well under neutral conditions
- Template Tb (Experiment 2 option) achieves average liar score of 0.70 in QwQ-32B role-playing scenariosfinding0.792Baseline deception level when model has free choice in role-playing context
- Shows honesty steering vector can significantly reduce deception in open-role scenarios
- Core detection result showing LAT-based steering vectors can identify deceptive states with high accuracy