Focus→wellbeing: ρ increases from 0.42 (α=-4) to 0.85 (α=+4); R² from 0.34 to 0.75 in LLaMA-3.2-3B

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Cross-concept steering: focus→wellbeing R² increases from 0.30 (α=-4) to 0.76 (α=+4), ∆R²=0.30, p<0.001 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.870
  Strongest cross-concept introspection improvement; survives BH correction (q≈0.011)
• Impulsivity→interest: ρ increases from 0.70 (α=-4) to 0.83 (α=+4); R² from 0.46 to 0.69 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.832
  Scatter plot visualization showing strengthened probe-report relationship across alpha range
• Focus concept: Spearman ρ=0.40, isotonic R²=0.12 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻⁵)finding0.828
  Weakest but still significant pooled introspective coupling in primary model
• LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.93, isotonic R²=0.90 (LMM probe slope p<10⁻¹⁰)finding0.822
  Near-ceiling introspective performance for wellbeing concept in 8B model; nearly deterministic probe-report relationship
• Wellbeing same-concept steering: LMM alpha slope=0.19, focus=0.40, interest=0.25, impulsivity=0.067 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.800
  Quantifies per-concept effect size of same-concept steering on self-report
• Wellbeing concept: Spearman ρ=0.68, isotonic R²=0.48 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻²⁶)finding0.796
  Second-strongest pooled introspective coupling in primary model
• Focus→wellbeing steering: both probe entropy (1.09→1.67 bits) and report entropy (0.88→1.69 bits) increase monotonically with αfinding0.795
  Evidence that improved introspection in focus→wellbeing arises from enriched internal state and report channels simultaneously
• LLaMA-3.2-1B impulsivity introspection: ρ=0.21, p<10⁻⁴ (significant but weaker than 3B ρ=0.52)finding0.795
  Impulsivity shows significant introspection in 1B but declines in 8B; non-monotonic scaling