LLaMA-3.2-1B impulsivity introspection: ρ=0.21, p<10⁻⁴ (significant but weaker than 3B ρ=0.52)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Impulsivity→interest: ρ increases from 0.70 (α=-4) to 0.83 (α=+4); R² from 0.46 to 0.69 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.875
  Scatter plot visualization showing strengthened probe-report relationship across alpha range
• Impulsivity concept: Spearman ρ=0.51, isotonic R²=0.31 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻¹²)finding0.864
  Third-strongest pooled introspective coupling in primary model
• LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.93, isotonic R²=0.90 (LMM probe slope p<10⁻¹⁰)finding0.862
  Near-ceiling introspective performance for wellbeing concept in 8B model; nearly deterministic probe-report relationship
• Impulsivity probe: peak Cohen's d=3.60 (layer 13), p=3.58×10⁻¹³ in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.848
  Strongest probe validation result; highest Cohen's d among the four concepts
• Impulsivity introspective fidelity decreases from turn 1 to turn 10: ∆R²=-0.28 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.834
  Opposite temporal trend to wellbeing/interest/focus; introspective fidelity weakens over conversation for impulsivity
• Cross-concept steering: impulsivity→interest R² increases from 0.55 (α=-4) to 0.72 (α=+4), ∆R²=0.10, p=0.012 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.829
  Second significant cross-concept introspection improvement; marginal after BH correction (q≈0.066)
• Wellbeing introspective strength at turn 1: ρ=0.52, p=5.46×10⁻⁴ in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.823
  Demonstrates introspection is present from the first conversation turn without needing multi-turn context
• Interest introspection improves from 1B to 3B: ρ from 0.19 to 0.80, R² from 0.05 to 0.66finding0.814
  Largest single-step scaling improvement; demonstrates dramatic introspection gain between 1B and 3B models for interest