Impulsivity introspective fidelity decreases from turn 1 to turn 10: ∆R²=-0.28 in LLaMA-3.2-3B

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Qwen 2.5 7B turn-wise introspective fidelity: strong at turn 1 (R²≈0.90) but declines significantly to turn 10 (∆R²=-0.44, p=0.001)finding0.861
  Introspective fidelity erodes in Qwen as conversations progress; contrasts with LLaMA-3B trend
• LLaMA-3.2-1B impulsivity introspection: ρ=0.21, p<10⁻⁴ (significant but weaker than 3B ρ=0.52)finding0.834
  Impulsivity shows significant introspection in 1B but declines in 8B; non-monotonic scaling
• Impulsivity→interest: ρ increases from 0.70 (α=-4) to 0.83 (α=+4); R² from 0.46 to 0.69 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.831
  Scatter plot visualization showing strengthened probe-report relationship across alpha range
• Cross-concept steering: impulsivity→interest R² increases from 0.55 (α=-4) to 0.72 (α=+4), ∆R²=0.10, p=0.012 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.819
  Second significant cross-concept introspection improvement; marginal after BH correction (q≈0.066)
• Wellbeing introspective strength at turn 1: ρ=0.52, p=5.46×10⁻⁴ in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.817
  Demonstrates introspection is present from the first conversation turn without needing multi-turn context
• Impulsivity concept: Spearman ρ=0.51, isotonic R²=0.31 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻¹²)finding0.809
  Third-strongest pooled introspective coupling in primary model
• LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.93, isotonic R²=0.90 (LMM probe slope p<10⁻¹⁰)finding0.786
  Near-ceiling introspective performance for wellbeing concept in 8B model; nearly deterministic probe-report relationship
• Mean validated introspective fidelity across concept-model pairs: R²=0.12 (1B), 0.37 (3B), 0.61 (8B); pooled LMM β=0.29, p=5.55×10⁻⁹⁹finding0.784
  Strong scaling trend for introspective fidelity when excluding invalid steering-sign pairs