Wellbeing concept: Spearman ρ=0.68, isotonic R²=0.48 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻²⁶)

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Focus concept: Spearman ρ=0.40, isotonic R²=0.12 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻⁵)finding0.860
  Weakest but still significant pooled introspective coupling in primary model
• Interest concept: Spearman ρ=0.76, isotonic R²=0.54 between logit self-report and probe score in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400)finding0.857
  Strongest pooled introspective coupling across the four emotive concepts in the primary model
• Impulsivity concept: Spearman ρ=0.51, isotonic R²=0.31 in LLaMA-3.2-3B (n=400, p<10⁻¹²)finding0.857
  Third-strongest pooled introspective coupling in primary model
• LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.93, isotonic R²=0.90 (LMM probe slope p<10⁻¹⁰)finding0.848
  Near-ceiling introspective performance for wellbeing concept in 8B model; nearly deterministic probe-report relationship
• Qwen 2.5 7B-Instruct wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.49, isotonic R²=0.76 (LMM p<10⁻¹⁰)finding0.824
  Strong introspective coupling in Qwen model; demonstrates cross-family generalization of introspective capacity
• Wellbeing same-concept steering: LMM alpha slope=0.19, focus=0.40, interest=0.25, impulsivity=0.067 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.803
  Quantifies per-concept effect size of same-concept steering on self-report
• Gemma 3 4B-IT wellbeing introspection: ρ=0.28, isotonic R²=0.11 (LMM p=1.33×10⁻¹³)finding0.803
  Weaker but still significant introspective coupling in Gemma model; consistent with lower probe quality
• Focus→wellbeing: ρ increases from 0.42 (α=-4) to 0.85 (α=+4); R² from 0.34 to 0.75 in LLaMA-3.2-3Bfinding0.796
  Scatter plot visualization of the dramatic tightening of probe-report relationship at extreme steering settings