finding
active
finding:bourget-and-chalmers-2020-survey-39-of-philosophers-accept-or-lean-toward-future-ai-consciousnessBourget and Chalmers 2020 survey: ~39% of philosophers accept or lean toward future AI consciousness
Survey result on philosophical attitudes toward AI consciousness.
Source paper
extracted_from(2024) · Robert Long · Jeff Sebo · Patrick Butlin · Kathleen Finlinson +6
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Claims (1)
claim
- Defense against biological substrate objections.
Communities (2)
community
- All minds are composites of parts; individual and collective intelligence unified under substrate-neutral principles.
- Substrate neutrality of consciousnessmembers_ofPhilosophical shift toward machine consciousness plausibility, documented by Bourget & Chalmers 2020 and Francken et al. 2022 surveys showing majority philosopher acceptance.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Consciousness in AI is best assessed by drawing on neuroscientific theories of consciousness.claim0.805Central methodological claim of the paper.
- Francken et al. 2022 survey of ASSC members: only 3% responded 'no' to machines having consciousnessfinding0.793Survey result showing widespread expert openness to machine consciousness.
- Summary of contributions.
- Central thesis of the report.
- Key takeaway from abstract, amended version.
- Main interpretive assertion of the search result; identifies the gap between existing literature domains and the novel research direction.
- Expert forecast cited to establish urgency of the research question