Part III: Explaining Human Action: Why Dynamics Tell Us That Stories Are Necessary

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Narrative Explanation and the Dynamics of Actionconcept0.845
• Narrative explanation is necessary for explaining self-organizing dynamical systems because their behavior cannot be reduced to deductive-nomological form.claim0.792
• Explaining self-organizing action requires narrative (hermeneutic) explanation, not deductive law-like subsumption.claim0.775
  Justifies why dynamical accounts necessitate stories; historical, contextual unfolding cannot be captured by timeless laws.
• it creates a ‘we’; what we are doing, for example, whether our behaviours are coordinated or not, becomes a relevant variable.quote0.767
  Illustrates how non-separable functions shift identity to the collective level.
• "[W]e must confess that perception, and what depends upon it, is inexplicable in terms of mechanical reasons... we will find only parts that push one another, and we will never find anything to explain a perception."quote0.763
  Load-bearing quote from Monadology §17 providing earliest clear statement of the Hard Problem
• The concept of role play is central to understanding the behaviour of dialogue agentsclaim0.757
  Core thesis of the paper; the role-play framework is proposed as the primary lens for LLM-based dialogue agents
• What is needed to support individual acts of construction is a three-dimensional diagram of the actual shape of the needed space, more physical even than a model.claim0.757
  The core proposal for a new form of urban plan to guide piecemeal construction.
• Although none of these behaviours necessarily require sentience, they are often proposed as evidence of animal sentience because of their subjective correlates in humans.claim0.756
  Acknowledgment that the same behaviours are used to infer sentience in animals despite not proving it.