Part II: Dynamical Systems Theory and Human Action

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Dynamical Systems Theoryconcept0.817
  Mathematical and conceptual framework for modeling complex self-organizing systems; applied here to action and cognition.
• Dynamical systems approach to cognitionframework0.808
  Framework treating cognitive processes as continuous dynamical phenomena rather than discrete computational steps; compatible with biogenic view.
• Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex Systemframework0.789
• Causal Theories of Actionconcept0.774
  Traditional mechanistic accounts (Danto, Chisholm, Goldman) that Juarrero critiques as resting on outdated Newtonian causality.
• Progress in machine behavior science and biohybrid engineering breaks down the simplistic dualism of life vs. machine, revealing a continuum of emergence, rational control, and agency.claim0.763
  Second central claim: life and machine form a continuous multidimensional space, not discrete bins
• What is the difference between action and mere behavior in a dynamical systems framework?question0.751
• When a system of living processes acts in a human environment, two kinds of structures will appear within reach of every person: a unique private world and an attached public world.hypothesis0.751
  Predictive claim about the automatic spatial output of living process
• Action places an upper bound on the entropy of biological states, thereby conserving structural and dynamical integrity.claim0.751
  Autopoietic aspect of active inference.