claim
active
claim:narrative-explanation-is-necessary-for-explaining-self-organizing-dynamical-systems-because-their-behavior-cannot-be-reduced-to-deductive-nomological-formNarrative explanation is necessary for explaining self-organizing dynamical systems because their behavior cannot be reduced to deductive-nomological form.
Source paper
extracted_fromNeighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (3)
community
- Cross-scale frameworks linking spatial patterns, diagrams, and simplicity as expressions of care in design.
- Frameworks treating meaning-making as emergent from relational configurations—spatial diagrams, image schemas, and narrative structures—rather than essential properties, drawing on systems theory and cognitive linguistics.
- Argues hermeneutic/narrative explanation irreducibly replaces deductive-nomological models for dynamical systems.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Justifies why dynamical accounts necessitate stories; historical, contextual unfolding cannot be captured by timeless laws.
- Epistemological consequence: shows why narrative explanation is necessary for explaining self-organizing action (Chapters 14–15).
- Juarrero argues that explaining self-organizing action requires hermeneutic narrative, not deductive law-like regularity.
- Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
- Final unresolved theoretical tension the paper leaves open regarding whether representation is foundational or founded on autonomy.
- Claim supported by Experiment 4: prior self-referential induction yields higher self-awareness scores on paradoxical reasoning where introspection is only indirectly afforded