Criterion 1: Φ estimates must yield >80% 'good' cases (higher score → higher Φ) per ToM task to indicate potential consciousness.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• If 'consciousness' phenomenon can be observed from ToM-related RN, higher ToM test scores should yield higher values of μΦmax (IIT 3.0) and/or μΦ (IIT 4.0).hypothesis0.864
  Specific prediction linking IIT's prediction of high Φ for good performance to the experimental design's scoring structure.
• Even if a case successfully meets all three criteria, this does not necessarily indicate that the corresponding sequence of representations is conscious. Rather, it suggests the observation of a potential 'consciousness' phenomenon within these representations — nothing more.quote0.793
  Load-bearing epistemic caution the author places on the entire analytical framework.
• None of the cases identified under temporal permutation satisfy the Criterion 1 threshold of >80% 'good' cases for any ToM task.finding0.779
  Even the rare cases where good > bad do not reach the 80% significance threshold required by Criterion 1.
• Consciousness in AI is best assessed by drawing on neuroscientific theories of consciousness.claim0.775
  Central methodological claim of the paper.
• It is basically impossible to determine if a computer program generates conscious experience by merely observing its performance; a test for consciousness must take internal structure into account.claim0.772
  Paper's argument against behavioral tests for consciousness, establishing why MCH requires internal analysis
• Can estimates of Φ, the primary metric of IIT, robustly differentiate responses across distinct ToM performance levels?question0.772
  Criterion 1 operationalization: requires >80% 'good' cases (higher score → higher Φ) per ToM task.
• Criterion 3: IIT estimates must achieve higher mean AUC than Span Representation for ToM score classification.concept0.772
  Third of three operational criteria; distinguishes consciousness from inherent LLM representational separations.
• Do distinctions in Φ estimates remain robust across diverse ToM stimuli in repeated large-scale trials?question0.770
  Criterion 2 operationalization: requires p<0.05 in Wilcoxon tests across score categories.