None of the cases identified under temporal permutation satisfy the Criterion 1 threshold of >80% 'good' cases for any ToM task.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Under temporal permutation control, no cases meeting all three criteria for observed 'consciousness' phenomenon were found among the 165,365 valid samples.finding0.815
  Primary negative result of the study: temporal permutation analysis finds no statistically significant indicators of consciousness in LLM representations.
• Under spatio permutation controls, two cases (Layer 32 of Mixtral-8x7B on Strange Stories, IIT 4.0, Linguistic Spans: Entire and Complement) satisfy all three criteria.finding0.795
  Contrasts with temporal permutation results; constitutes the most suggestive evidence of potential consciousness phenomena in LLM representations.
• Criterion 1: Φ estimates must yield >80% 'good' cases (higher score → higher Φ) per ToM task to indicate potential consciousness.concept0.779
  First of three operational criteria for identifying consciousness phenomena in LLM representations.
• All cases satisfying Criteria 1 and 2 (two out of three) originate from deeper transformer layers and/or the 2/3 layer of LLMs.finding0.764
  Consistent with literature that deeper layers encode semantic information and align with human brain activity.
• Criterion 3: IIT estimates must achieve higher mean AUC than Span Representation for ToM score classification.concept0.764
  Third of three operational criteria; distinguishes consciousness from inherent LLM representational separations.
• Variations in ToM test score categories are more likely attributed to span-level information of the LLM representation sequence rather than to a 'consciousness' phenomenon as suggested by IIT estimates.claim0.755
  Main interpretive finding from Criterion 3 comparison showing Span Representation consistently outperforms IIT under temporal permutation.
• Even if a case successfully meets all three criteria, this does not necessarily indicate that the corresponding sequence of representations is conscious. Rather, it suggests the observation of a potential 'consciousness' phenomenon within these representations — nothing more.quote0.755
  Load-bearing epistemic caution the author places on the entire analytical framework.
• For a given task, the number of all sequences which work is tiny by comparison with the huge number of all possible sequences; less than a trillionth of all 6 × 10^23 possible sequences actually work well enough.claim0.748
  A combinatorial argument that good sequences are astronomically rare, emphasizing the difficulty of discovery.