Transportation engineers must make their work on cars subsidiary to the work which defines the pedestrian hulls as places which people can use, and own.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The car must therefore be made to play second fiddle to the pedestrian.claim0.785
  Fundamental priority rule for the four-fold process.
• pedestrian hullsconcept0.771
  Hulls of public space designed primarily for walking, calm, and human presence, where cars are secondary or absent.
• All six of the illustrated projects help to form hulls of public space by strengthening their centeredness.claim0.753
  Claim that each example contributes to the spatial hulls described in chapter 3.
• Cars do not dominate, they are the low man on the totem pole, and are squeezed in where they can be fitted, but are not allowed to destroy the neighborhood or its communal, living structure.quote0.740
  Vividly captures the reversal of conventional car-pedestrian priority.
• A system of hulls of public space will inevitably be created by the unfolding of a living process, if it is truly living and truly allowed to unfold.claim0.730
  The inevitability of hulls as the outcome of living process.
• Engineers should be given the chance to study previous works that have proven their worth in the field, not constantly create new artifacts.concept0.729
• When living processes are applied systematically to the public space in a human community, they will generate a system of articulated, useful, coherent, and mainly pedestrian spaces.claim0.726
  Core claim about the generative power of living process on public space.
• Our present forms of planning, design, construction, and production are deeply flawed because they do not include step-by-step adaptation and cannot in principle do so as they are.claim0.723
  Sweeping indictment of current production systems.