claim
active
claim:the-wanting-liking-dissociation-is-a-dissociation-between-two-kinds-of-evaluation-and-two-corresponding-dimensions-of-experience-not-between-evaluation-and-experience-as-suchThe wanting/liking dissociation is a dissociation between two kinds of evaluation and two corresponding dimensions of experience, not between evaluation and experience as such
Accommodation of Berridge and Robinson's dopamine dissociation within the identity framework
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Findings (1)
finding
- The wanting/liking dissociation that is accommodated rather than refuted by the identity thesis
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Berridge and Robinson's finding that dopamine mediates wanting but not liking; accommodated as two evaluation types
- Distinction between superficial and deep preference.
- Linking real liking to self-discovery.
- The culminating identity claim: the act of true self-pleasing and the creation of living structure are one and the same process.
- The central identity claim of the chapter linking objective structure to subjective experience
- The genuine, deep pleasure that comes from the whole person and childish truthfulness—distinguished from wilfulness, professional posturing, or pleasing others' expectations.
- Assertion of the empirical but mysterious basis of deep liking.
- Load-bearing synthesis of Buddhist philosophical insight enabling dynamic, non-essentialist models of identity.