Our everyday liking (subjective preference) often diverges from deep liking, but deep liking converges to agreement and corresponds to living structure.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• As observers mature, their liking converges because they discover the deeper self that is shared.claim0.845
  Developmental claim about aesthetic maturity.
• The reasons for the existence of this deep liking are mysterious, not obvious. To plumb them we shall have to examine the nature of things - even, ultimately, the nature of matter itself - very carefully. Nevertheless the reasons are empirical. We may determine, empirically, to what extent a thing has the ability to rouse this deep liking in us.claim0.830
  Assertion of the empirical but mysterious basis of deep liking.
• Real liking comes from childish truthfulness, in which one respects one's own feeling and does not pay homage to a theory or idea.claim0.828
  Definition of genuine liking as originating in a pre-conceptual, child-like authenticity.
• Somehow, the experience of real liking has to do with self. As we find out which things awaken real liking in ourselves, we find ourselves more in touch than before with our own selves.claim0.821
  Linking real liking to self-discovery.
• The more accurate we are about what we really like, in the sense of liking from the heart, the more we find out that we agree with other people about what these things are.claim0.807
  Assertion of convergence among deep personal preferences.
• The living process can be steered by the extent to which it has deep feeling in it.claim0.806
• Living processes are based necessarily on deep feeling.claim0.804
• The wanting/liking dissociation is a dissociation between two kinds of evaluation and two corresponding dimensions of experience, not between evaluation and experience as suchclaim0.801
  Accommodation of Berridge and Robinson's dopamine dissociation within the identity framework