claim
active
claim:the-hard-problem-and-explanatory-gap-may-be-symptoms-of-our-metaphysical-malnourishment-arising-from-conflating-three-distinct-notions-of-realityThe Hard Problem and explanatory gap may be symptoms of our metaphysical malnourishment, arising from conflating three distinct notions of reality.
Author's interpretive diagnosis of why consciousness seems philosophically intractable
Source paper
extracted_fromNeighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Frameworks (1)
framework
- Chalmers' problem: why structural/functional criteria should correlate with subjective experience; acknowledged as unsolvable in 3rd person.
Concepts (1)
concept
- Three Orders of RealitysupportsThe paper's tripartite framework distinguishing psychological reality (representations), causal reality (functional mechanisms), and physical reality (matter/energy)
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The Hard Problem is likely unsolvable in 3rd person and should not stand as a barrier to progress.claim0.814Position that the Hard Problem should not halt applied sentience assessment.
- CIMC's distinctive position distinguishing itself from eliminativist and deflationary responses to the Hard Problem
- Authors propose deep principle unifying neuroscience and developmental biology through goal-directed behavior as common thread.
- Load-bearing quote from Monadology §17 providing earliest clear statement of the Hard Problem
- Canonical illustration of the Hard Problem intuition that any functional/mechanical explanation faces an explanatory gap for perception
- Russell's statement opening Section 2 articulating the core motivation for the Contemplative AI approach
- CIMC's honest acknowledgment that articulating why phenomenology is the model remains an active open problem