concept
active
concept:a-complete-explanation-of-why-phenomenology-and-function-coincide-that-would-address-hard-problem-concerns-has-not-yet-been-achievedA complete explanation of why phenomenology and function coincide that would address Hard Problem concerns has not yet been achieved
CIMC's honest acknowledgment that articulating why phenomenology is the model remains an active open problem
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
- cimcWhitepaperassociated_with
Claims (1)
claim
- Core resolution claim: phenomenal experience and its functional role coincide; resolving this is key to closing the Hard Problem
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- The Hard Problem is likely unsolvable in 3rd person and should not stand as a barrier to progress.claim0.765Position that the Hard Problem should not halt applied sentience assessment.
- Author's interpretive diagnosis of why consciousness seems philosophically intractable
- will different systems facing similar computational problems converge to similar solutions, including consciousness?question0.756Key question for the Machine Consciousness Hypothesis and the universality hypothesis extension
- CIMC's distinctive position distinguishing itself from eliminativist and deflationary responses to the Hard Problem
- Claim about broad impact of studying these dynamics
- Russell's statement opening Section 2 articulating the core motivation for the Contemplative AI approach
- Evolution pivoted the same problem-solving strategies across different domains.
- Authors propose deep principle unifying neuroscience and developmental biology through goal-directed behavior as common thread.