Sentience criteria should not require second-order cognitive abilities like reflection on feelings.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The criteria for concern should not require 2nd order abilities of creatures to reflect on their feelings.claim0.869
  Alignment with Crump et al. that metacognition is too high a bar.
• What Are The Appropriate Criteria For Assessing Sentiencequestion0.842
• Sentience assessment should seek deep invariants across possible minds, not arbitrary criteria tied to evolution on Earthclaim0.831
  Core normative claim: frameworks must identify fundamental properties of sentience independent of phylogenetic accident or familiar substrates.
• If behaviour is the window to sentience, evaluation criteria must focus on observable response patterns without reference to the means by which they are produced.quote0.826
  Key prescriptive statement supporting the system-agnostic approach.
• Eight Sentience Criteria (Crump et al.)framework0.824
  Quantitative, flexible framework for assessing sentience: nociception, sensory integration, analgesia, trade-offs, self-protection, learning, preference.
• Crump et al. eight criteria for sentiencemethod0.812
  Set of eight criteria: nociception, sensory integration, integrated nociception, analgesia, motivational trade-offs, flexible self-protection, associative learning, analgesia preference.
• We should err on the side of reducing false negatives with respect to sentience criteria for ethical concern.claim0.809
  Ethical precaution advocated by Levin and Crump et al.
• Cognitive functions, including sentience, can potentially be achieved by very different systems and their disparate substrates.claim0.802
  Central multiple-realizability claim of the paper, from abstract and §2.