Pure cognitivism does not imply that all normative or evaluative judgments are emotions.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Non-cognitivism does not entail that normative or evaluative judgments are essentially affective states.claim0.888
  Defense against non-cognitivist objection.
• Pure Cognitivismframework0.800
  The view that emotions just are normative/evaluative judgments of a certain kind.
• In every evaluative neural system yet studied, evaluative computation and affective processing are inseparableclaim0.765
  Empirical grounding of the identity thesis across four independent neural systems
• There is no principled continuum of ethical concern that scales from simple homeostatic agents to complex metacognitive beings, allowing rational allocation of moral statusquestion0.763
  Central gap that Diverse Intelligence is proposed to fill
• "Continuum of cognitive capacities—no binary categories, no bright line separating true cognition from 'just physics.'"quote0.763
  Core tenet of TAME from Table 1; foundational to gradualist approach to cognition across all substrates.
• The same charitable interpretation must be extended to all systems that display observable response patterns that are consistent with animal cognition, including artificial intelligences, metaplastic materials, and robotic systems.claim0.757
  Call to extend the inference of sentience to non-biological systems as well.
• Sentience criteria should not require second-order cognitive abilities like reflection on feelings.claim0.756
• The evaluative process central to learning is identical to conscious experienceclaim0.756
  The central thesis of the paper: that valence just is goal-relative prediction error