claim
active
claim:proposition-4-2-establishes-that-no-fixed-self-exists-yet-the-self-that-understands-this-proposition-appears-to-remain-a-paradox-nagarjuna-addresses-as-sunyata-sunyataProposition 4.2 establishes that no fixed self exists, yet the self that 'understands' this proposition appears to remain — a paradox Nāgārjuna addresses as śūnyatā-śūnyatā.
Acknowledged self-referential paradox left unresolved by the formal elucidation.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Concepts (1)
concept
- Buddhist concept that even emptiness is empty; formally related to the structural realism claim that even relations are defined by further relations
Questions (1)
question
- Open question probing the paradox that a self persists to 'understand' the non-existence of a fixed self.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Author assertion: rejection of singular self enables perception of distributed/dynamic selfhood; foundation for affordance augmentation hypothesis.
- Foundational claim of the paper, defining self-evidencing.
- Core biological claim about the plasticity of self-models, grounding the broader philosophical argument about identity and change
- Self can be understood as distributed, distributable, and dynamic rather than singular and enduring.claim0.758Core interpretive position synthesizing Buddhist and contemporary cognitive science views; foundational for hypothesis.
- The outcome of using both methods together.
- Core theoretical move of the paper unwinding circular self-reference into a natural-time spiral.