claim
active
claim:apparent-paradoxes-of-self-reference-are-illusions-produced-by-projecting-a-time-involving-process-into-a-timeless-representation-and-are-resolved-when-natural-time-is-made-explicitApparent paradoxes of self-reference are illusions produced by projecting a time-involving process into a timeless representation, and are resolved when natural time is made explicit.
Core theoretical move of the paper unwinding circular self-reference into a natural-time spiral.
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Samson Abramsky · Wolfgang Banzhaf · Leo S. D. Caves · Michael Levin +4
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
- Open questions about time and self-reference in living systemsmentionssupports
Questions (1)
question
- Organizing question of §4.2 linking self-reference and natural time.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Claim supported by Experiment 4: prior self-referential induction yields higher self-awareness scores on paradoxical reasoning where introspection is only indirectly afforded
- Methodological proposal to integrate knowledge from contemplative and cognitive science into AI/artificial life frameworks.
- Experiment 4 result ruling out semantic priming as explanation for the experimental effect
- The core interpretive question the paper narrows but cannot definitively answer
- Claim that endowing non-human agents with self-illusion awareness expands their affordance repertoire.
- The theoretical hypothesis tested across all four experiments; motivated by convergence of GWT, RPT, HOT, IIT, predictive processing on recurrent/self-referential dynamics
- Author's methodological assertion: integration of contemplative insight with computational modeling.