claim
active
claim:modern-machines-are-increasingly-interdependent-not-independentModern machines are increasingly interdependent, not independent.
Challenges classical assumption that machines are separate from environment and each other.
Source paper
extracted_from(2021) · Joshua Bongard · Michael Levin
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (3)
community
- Cross-scale frameworks linking spatial patterns, diagrams, and simplicity as expressions of care in design.
- Living systems as 21st-century machinesmembers_ofReconceptualizes life and biological complexity through modern computational principles—substrate-dependence, multiscale integration, irreducibility—rather than mechanical reductionism, bridging xenobiology and machine learning circa 2020s.
- Life-machine boundary dissolutionmembers_ofArgues 21st-century machines share properties once unique to living systems, collapsing categorical distinctions.
Claims (1)
claim
- Core thesis: the machine metaphor requires updating, not abandoning, in light of modern machine behavior.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Deep neural networks, swarms, and complex autonomous systems require holistic ethological and cognitive approaches.
- Quantum computers, ML systems, and evolved machines exploit uncertainty rather than requiring determinism.
- Evolutionary algorithms and self-organizing systems blur distinction between evolved and designed.
- First central claim of the paper: the machine concept used in organicist critiques is historically contingent, not essential
- General historical verdict.
- Claim that the organism–machine dichotomy is outdated.
- Taylor's own words revealing the deliberate deskilling and cost-cutting aim of scientific management.
- Russell's statement opening Section 2 articulating the core motivation for the Contemplative AI approach