claim
active
claim:model-internals-of-genomic-foundation-models-can-yield-mechanistic-explanations-for-variant-effectsModel internals of genomic foundation models can yield mechanistic explanations for variant effects
Foundational interpretability claim that the paper exemplifies.
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Pearce, Michael · Dooms, Thomas · Yamamoto, Ryo · Meehl, Joshua +18
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Communities (2)
community
- Spans attention head decomposition, benchmark awareness, and genomic pathogenicity prediction via neural models.
- Using genomic foundation model internals to generate disruption profiles that explain variant effects mechanistically, achieving 0.997 AUROC on ClinVar pathogenicity prediction.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Large pretrained models for genomic sequences; subject of this work's pooling improvements.
- Core interpretability claim distinguishing EVEE from black-box prediction tools; applies interpretability for science.
- Observed by Anima Labs in untrained base models; not present in training data, implying computational origin of self-reported parallel processing.
- The causal hypothesis motivating the use of causality (intervention) as the lens connecting representation and behavior geometry.
- Highlights the non-genetic control of large-scale anatomy.
- Claim that capability emerges from architecture, not data, and that later models lose the surprise.
- Author assertion about current knowledge gaps.