I promise to keep connecting the dots. I promise to read the footnotes. Very carefully.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• "This will simply be another 'finger pointing at the moon,' in a language that might provide a generative bridge between the contemplative and scientific domains of inquiry."quote0.749
  Frames the paper's epistemic status and intent; invokes the traditional Buddhist metaphor to situate the formal model
• For some purposes, it will be convenient to settle for specifications in terms of fulfilling internal commitments, and sometimes the public character of promises will have to be taken into account in the specifications.claim0.743
  Trade-off between internal and public obligations.
• How does the marching steady pace of a text block hold its own against the slithering, sometimes sneering, snarky, or otherwise undercutting character of the footnote?question0.742
  Dramatizes the struggle between main text and paratext.
• My son, if you would devote yourself to combining Holy Names, still greater things would happen to you.… And now, my son, admit that you are unable to bear not combining.quote0.733
  Opening quote from Abraham ben Samuel Abulafia, used to frame the combinatorial nature of creating novel life.
• If someone develops clear enough introspection, they will eventually conclude that thought is rendered as subtle perturbations in phenomenal fields.hypothesis0.732
  Cube Flipper's prediction about convergence of insight practice on field model.
• Under these conditions, what is done next always has a natural and comfortable relation to what existed before: it has a similar structure and never violates the previously existing structure.claim0.730
  Characteristic of a structure-preserving process.
• Alexander jettisons many arguments; he rejects the computers and mathematics used in Notes a year after its publication.claim0.729
  Observation of Alexander's pattern of self-rejection.
• Two concepts should not have the same purpose; additional concepts for the same purpose create needless complexity.claim0.728
  No redundancy criterion.