How does the marching steady pace of a text block hold its own against the slithering, sometimes sneering, snarky, or otherwise undercutting character of the footnote?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The familiarity of the text block renders its conventions almost invisible.claim0.746
  Points out how deeply internalized layout norms become naturalized and unnoticed.
• If a text attempts to stand alone, it will almost certainly attract commentary or interference.hypothesis0.745
  Predicts the inevitability of dialogic intrusion upon any statement.
• I promise to keep connecting the dots. I promise to read the footnotes. Very carefully.claim0.742
• If the snippet works well, it may be adopted and spread to new construction methods, even in the context of different attitudes.hypothesis0.741
  Conditional prediction about the self-propagation of small effective sequences.
• How might the text behave otherwise?question0.728
  Opens up imaginative alternatives to conventional layout.
• What are the chances that a text will be left without interference if it attempts to stand alone?question0.725
• Skill output should contain no filler; every line of a run-summary should carry weight.claim0.715
• Almost any social process can have a relatively more living character, or have a relatively less living character.claim0.713