claim
active
claim:elephant-speech-acts-are-a-step-above-strings-because-the-higher-levels-of-the-speech-acts-have-a-meaning-independent-of-the-application-programElephant speech acts are a step above strings, because the higher levels of the speech acts have a meaning independent of the application program.
Advantage of speech acts over plain strings.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Seventh abstract claim.
- McCarthy's position against Searle: computers can genuinely promise without requiring Searle's conditions (e.g., belief that fulfillment benefits recipient).
- Fifth abstract claim.
- Claim about designing institutions for program speech acts.
- Fourth abstract claim.
- Many uses of speech acts do not require human-level intelligence for programs to perform them.claim0.780Key contention of paper: Elephant 2000 can support varying levels of AI capability without requiring full human intelligence.
- McCarthy's fundamental position: most important features of speech acts are independent of whether agents are human or machine.
- Elephant source programs may not need data structures, because they can refer directly to the past.claim0.738Third abstract claim.