claim
active
claim:speech-acts-are-necessary-in-common-sense-informatic-situations-where-agents-with-different-goals-and-knowledge-interactSpeech acts are necessary in common sense informatic situations where agents with different goals and knowledge interact.
McCarthy's fundamental position: most important features of speech acts are independent of whether agents are human or machine.
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Communities (3)
community
- Active inference & agent ecologymembers_ofFree energy minimization, Markov blankets, trust gradients, and multi-agent rhythm/deferral frameworks
- Applying Christopher Alexander's structural aliveness framework to human-AI interaction design, separating aesthetics from competence.
- Speech acts in artificial agentsmembers_ofExamines how non-human agents can perform genuine speech acts through goal-relative cognition, bridging human and machine communication in multi-agent systems.
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Many uses of speech acts do not require human-level intelligence for programs to perform them.claim0.837Key contention of paper: Elephant 2000 can support varying levels of AI capability without requiring full human intelligence.
- Claim about designing institutions for program speech acts.
- Speculation about future extensions.
- Seventh abstract claim.
- What must be true in order that a speech act of a given kind be successfully performed?question0.784Key question shared with philosophers about successful speech acts.