What must be true in order that a speech act of a given kind be successfully performed?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Many uses of speech acts do not require human-level intelligence for programs to perform them.claim0.790
  Key contention of paper: Elephant 2000 can support varying levels of AI capability without requiring full human intelligence.
• Speech acts are necessary in common sense informatic situations where agents with different goals and knowledge interact.claim0.784
  McCarthy's fundamental position: most important features of speech acts are independent of whether agents are human or machine.
• Many speech act properties are independent of whether the agent is human or machine.claim0.777
• We may need to consider joint speech acts such as making an agreement.hypothesis0.777
  Speculation about future extensions.
• Many kinds of human speech act are relative to social institutions that change, and the exchange of speech acts among computer programs will often involve the design of new institutions prescribing the effects of speech acts.claim0.771
  Claim about designing institutions for program speech acts.
• Which speech act uses require AI/intentionality vs which do not?question0.765
• A skill should do its work and stop, avoiding performative complexity and multi-stage flows when single-pass suffices.claim0.758
• In order to actually do anything, the model must act through simulation of something.claim0.757
  Key consequence: GPT's power comes from simulating something contingent.