Artifacts can stabilize and make intersubjectively sharable aesthetic experiences of action.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• An injection of new structure into a place can either respect and enhance the existing wholeness or violate and destroy it; this is an objective structural fact, not merely aesthetic preference.claim0.776
  Alexander's assertion that judgments about whether interventions preserve wholeness are structural and mathematical rather than subjective or romantic.
• Significant aesthetic properties in an enactor's actions can be attributed to the designer's intentional artifact creation.claim0.773
• Aesthetic response and boundary awareness are the most independent dimensions of interface aliveness.claim0.772
• Spaces with special quality evoke memories and possess aesthetic resonance through integration of materials, ornament, color, and spatial experiencehypothesis0.771
• This quality is real, not merely an artifact of cognition but an objectively real physical phenomenon in space which our cognition detects.claim0.764
  Moves from subjective perception to ontological claim about the nature of space.
• it is not possible to understand either the life of artifacts, or the process which creates this life, without realizing that in the end all living processes are processes which lead towards this Iclaim0.759
  Argument that a non-mechanical view of matter is necessary to account for architectural facts.
• The images or schemata that guide actions may be wholeness preserving or not, and modern architects often paid no attention to existing wholeness.claim0.758
  Moral evaluation of modern architecture.
• The aesthetics of our own actions are already a natural part of the rich experience of our lives.concept0.758
  Opening claim establishing process aesthetics as pervasive human experience, motivating study of process arts.