paper:safron-levin-et-al-world-models-agi-life-mind-continuity-2026World models, artificial general intelligence and the hard problems of life–mind continuity: toward a unified understanding of natural and artificial intelligence
Claims (2)
- Natural and artificial intelligence can be unified through world models and life-mind continuity principles.
Core assertive position of the paper; frames AGI in continuity with biological intelligence.
- World models provide a bridge between diverse substrates of intelligence—biological, artificial, and hybrid.
Synthetic claim integrating Ha's work with Levin's xenobiology and Tenenbaum's cognitive modeling.
Questions (1)
- What is the nature of the boundary between life and mind, and how does it scale across biological and artificial systems?
Central open question framing the paper's synthesis.
Original abstract (expand)
Abstract This special issue examines how natural and artificial intelligences (AIs) model the world, and what this modelling reveals about cognition and relationships between life and mind. Rather than adopting a single definition, the collection considers how world models function and emerge in biological and artificial systems, exploring a diverse range of world modelling including causal, self-referential, individual goal-directed, collective and narrative forms. A recurring theme is the extent to which current AI systems trained on vast quantities of data learn the context-sensitive, temporally embedded, value-laden dimensions of world modelling that characterize diverse biological intelligences, or whether their impressive capabilities arise primarily from statistical surface regularities. The contributions also raise broader issues concerning embodiment, complexity, learning architectures and the social and scientific contexts in which world models operate. With this collection, we hope to clarify the conceptual landscape, identify key points of similarity and divergence between natural and artificial minds, and outline questions that may guide future research on the forms of world modelling that support grounded understanding, robust agency and potentially human-like general intelligence. This article is part of the theme issue ‘World models in natural and artificial intelligence’.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- ≈ 84%
- World Models Should Prioritize the Unification of Physical and Social DynamicsChengdong Ma, Yizhe Huang, Weidong Huang, Siyuan Qi, Song-Chun Zhu, Xue Feng, Yaodong Yang Xiaoyuan Zhang2025≈ 82%
- ≈ 81%
- ≈ 81%
- Research on World Models Is Not Merely Injecting World Knowledge into Specific TasksKaixin Zhu, Daili Hua, Bozhou Li, Chengzhuo Tong, Yuran Wang, Xinyi Huang, Yifan Dai, Zixiang Zhang, Yifan Yang, Zhou Liu, Hao Liang, Xiaochen Ma, Ruichuan An, Tianyi Bai, Hongcheng Gao, Junbo Niu, Yang Shi, Xinlong Chen, Yue Ding, Minglei Shi, Kai Zeng, Yiwen Tang, Yuanxing Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Xintao Wang, Wentao Zhang Bohan Zeng2026≈ 81%
- Modeling Human Behavior Part I -- Learning and Belief ApproachesAndrew Fuchs and Andrea Passarella and Marco Conti2022≈ 80%
- Understanding World or Predicting Future? A Comprehensive Survey of World ModelsYunke Zhang, Yu Shang, Jie Feng, Yuheng Zhang, Zefang Zong, Yuan Yuan, Hongyuan Su, Nian Li, Jinghua Piao, Yucheng Deng, Nicholas Sukiennik, Chen Gao, Fengli Xu, Yong Li Jingtao Ding2025≈ 80%
- ≈ 80%
- Socially Minded Intelligence: How Individuals, Groups, and Artificial Intelligence Can Make Each Other Smarter (or Not)S. Alexander Haslam, Janet Wiles William J. Bingley2026≈ 79%
- A Representationalist, Functionalist and Naturalistic Conception of Intelligence as a Foundation for AGIRolf Pfister2025≈ 79%
- ≈ 79%
- A Survey of Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Evaluations, Representations, and Safety RisksHieu Minh "Jord" Nguyen2025≈ 79%
- ≈ 79%
- ≈ 79%
- Spontaneous Theory of Mind for Artificial IntelligenceDavid V. Pynadath, Volkan Ustun Nikolos Gurney2024≈ 79%
- ≈ 79%
- ≈ 78%
- ≈ 77%
- ≈ 77%
- ≈ 76%
- ≈ 76%
- ≈ 75%
- ≈ 75%
- ≈ 75%
- ≈ 75%
- Core knowledgecited2000≈ 75%
- ≈ 74%
- The “Hard Problem” of Lifecited2017≈ 74%
- Contemplative Agentin corpus2025≈ 73%
- ≈ 73%
+18 more