paper:doi-10-1371-journal-pcbi-1005358How evolution learns to generalise: Using the principles of learning theory to understand the evolution of developmental organisation
Original abstract (expand)
One of the most intriguing questions in evolution is how organisms exhibit suitable phenotypic variation to rapidly adapt in novel selective environments. Such variability is crucial for evolvability, but poorly understood. In particular, how can natural selection favour developmental organisations that facilitate adaptive evolution in previously unseen environments? Such a capacity suggests foresight that is incompatible with the short-sighted concept of natural selection. A potential resolution is provided by the idea that evolution may discover and exploit information not only about the particular phenotypes selected in the past, but their underlying structural regularities: new phenotypes, with the same underlying regularities, but novel particulars, may then be useful in new environments. If true, we still need to understand the conditions in which natural selection will discover such deep regularities rather than exploiting 'quick fixes' (i.e., fixes that provide adaptive phenotypes in the short term, but limit future evolvability). Here we argue that the ability of evolution to discover such regularities is formally analogous to learning principles, familiar in humans and machines, that enable generalisation from past experience. Conversely, natural selection that fails to enhance evolvability is directly analogous to the learning problem of over-fitting and the subsequent failure to generalise. We support the conclusion that evolving systems and learning systems are different instantiations of the same algorithmic principles by showing that existing results from the learning domain can be transferred to the evolution domain. Specifically, we show that conditions that alleviate over-fitting in learning systems successfully predict which biological conditions (e.g., environmental variation, regularity, noise or a pressure for developmental simplicity) enhance evolvability. This equivalence provides access to a well-developed theoretical framework from learning theory that enables a characterisation of the general conditions for the evolution of evolvability.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- The principles of adaptation in organisms and machines I: machine learning, information theory, and thermodynamicsHideaki Shimazaki2019≈ 76%
- Learning to Theorize the World from ObservationGyubin Lee, Junyeob Baek, Hosung Lee, Sungjin Ahn Doojin Baek2026≈ 75%
- Evolution-Development Congruence in Pattern Formation Dynamics: Bifurcations in Gene Expressions and Regulation of Networks StructuresTakahiro Kohsokabe and Kunihiko Kaneko2015≈ 74%
- General Mechanism of Evolution Shared by Proteins and WordsHsing-Yi Lai, Sun-Ting Tsai, Chen Siang Ng, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Shan-Jyun Wu, Meng-Xue Tsai, Yi-Ching Su, Daw-Wei Wang, and Tzay-Ming Hong Li-Min Wang2026≈ 74%
- A variational synthesis of evolutionary and developmental dynamicsDaniel Ari Friedman, Axel Constant, V. Bleu Knight, Thomas Parr, John O. Campbell Karl Friston2023≈ 74%
- ≈ 74%
- ≈ 74%
- Learning Developmental Scaffoldings to Guide Self-OrganisationMilton L. Montero and Elias Najarro and Jakob Schauser and Sebastian Risi2026≈ 73%
- ≈ 73%
- Action and Perception as Divergence MinimizationPedro A. Ortega, Jimmy Ba, Thomas Parr, Karl Friston, Nicolas Heess Danijar Hafner2022≈ 72%
- ≈ 72%
- There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep LearningDaniel Kunin, Alexander Atanasov, Enric Boix-Adser\`a, Blake Bordelon, Jeremy Cohen, Nikhil Ghosh, Florentin Guth, Arthur Jacot, Mason Kamb, Dhruva Karkada, Eric J. Michaud, Berkan Ottlik, Joseph Turnbull Jamie Simon2026≈ 72%
- Specialization after Generalization: Towards Understanding Test-Time Training in Foundation ModelsPatrik Wolf, Alexander Shevchenko, Dennis J\"uni, Andreas Krause, Gil Kur Jonas H\"ubotter2026≈ 72%
- ≈ 72%
- Discovering Latent States for Model Learning: Applying Sensorimotor Contingencies Theory and Predictive Processing to Model ContextNikolas J. Hemion2016≈ 72%
- Design for an Individual: Connectionist Approaches to the Evolutionary Transitions in Individualityin corpus2022≈ 71%
- Learning without neurons in physical systemsin corpus2022≈ 70%
- ≈ 70%
- The biogenic approach to cognitionin corpus2005≈ 69%
- ≈ 69%
- ≈ 68%
- Simulators — LessWrongin corpus≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- Active Inference: A Process Theoryin corpus2017≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- ≈ 67%
- Towards a theory of conceptual design for softwarein corpus2015≈ 67%
- Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substratesin corpus2024≈ 67%
- Darwin's agential materials: evolutionary implications of multiscale competency in developmental biologyin corpus2023≈ 67%
- ≈ 67%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (4)
- Darwin's agential materials: evolutionary implications of multiscale competency in developmental biology
Cellular collectives operating between the genotype and anatomical phenotype constitute an agential substrate that fundamentally reshapes the evolutionary search process—this is the central claim of L
- Design for an Individual: Connectionist Approaches to the Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality
Evolutionary transitions in individuality (ETIs) require interaction structures among lower-level units that compute non-linearly separable functions — the same class of functions that single-layer Pe
- Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds
TAME—Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere—formalizes a non-binary, empirically grounded framework for recognizing, comparing, and manipulating cognition across radically diverse substrates, from
- The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition
Scale-Free Cognition, the framework introduced here, proposes that any coherent Self is demarcated by a 'cognitive light cone'—a spatio-temporal boundary of events a system can measure, model, and att