paper:doi-10-1177-1059712312465330What nervous systems do: early evolution, input–output, and the skin brain thesis
Original abstract (expand)
Nervous systems are standardly interpreted as information processing input–output devices. They receive environmental information from their sensors as input, subsequently process or adjust this information, and use the result to control effectors, providing output. Through-conducting activity is here the key organizational feature of nervous systems. In this paper, we argue that this input–output interpretation is not the most fundamental feature of nervous system organization. Building on biological work on the early evolution of nervous systems, we provide an alternative proposal: the skin brain thesis (SBT). The SBT postulates that early nervous systems evolved to organize a new multicellular effector: muscle tissue, the primary source of animal motility. Early nervous systems provided a new way of inducing and coordinating self-organized contractile activity across an extensive muscle surface underneath the skin. The main connectivity in such nervous systems runs across a spread out effector and is transverse to sensor-effector signaling. The SBT therefore constitutes a fundamental conceptual shift in understanding both nervous system operation and what nervous systems are. Nervous systems are foremost spatial organizers that turn large multi-cellular animal bodies into dynamic self-moving units. At the end, we briefly discuss some theoretical connections to central issues within the behavioral, cognitive and neurosciences.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- Neural mechanisms of predictive processing: a collaborative community experiment through the OpenScope programNicholas Audette, Ryszard Auksztulewicz, Krzysztof Basi\'nski, Andr\'e M. Bastos, Michael Berry, Andres Canales-Johnson, Hannah Choi, Claudia Clopath, Uri Cohen, Rui Ponte Costa, Roberto De Filippo, Roman Doronin, S\'everine Durand, Steven P. Errington, Jeffrey P. Gavornik, Colleen J. Gillon, Arno Granier, Jordan P. Hamm, Loreen Hert\"ag, Henry Kennedy, Sandeep Kumar, Alexander Ladd, Hugo Ladret, J\'er\^ome A. Lecoq, Alexander Maier, Patrick McCarthy, Jie Mei, Jorge Mejias, John Hongyu Meng, Fabian Mikulasch, Noga Mudrik, Farzaneh Najafi, Kevin Nejad, Hamed Nejat, Karim Oweiss, Mihai A. Petrovici, Viola Priesemann, Lucas Rudelt, Sarah Ruediger, Simone Russo, Alessandro Salatiello, Walter Senn, Eli Sennesh, Sepehr Sima, Cem Uran, Anna Vasilevskaya, Julien Vezoli, Martin Vinck, Xiao-Jing Wang, Jacob A. Westerberg, Katharina Wilmes, Yihan Sophy Xiong Ido Aizenbud2026≈ 77%
- ≈ 77%
- The brain versus AI: World-model-based versatile circuit computation underlying diverse functions in the neocortex and cerebellumShogo Ohmae and Keiko Ohmae2024≈ 76%
- ≈ 76%
- Mechanics of Morphogenesis in Neural Development: in vivo, in vitro, and in silicoHamed Seyyedhosseinzadeh, Zheng Ao, Haning Xiu, Kun Gou, Feng Guo, and Zi Chen Joseph Sutlive2022≈ 76%
- ≈ 76%
- Visual Theory of Mind Enables the Invention of Proto-WritingLucas Gelfond, George Konidaris Benjamin A. Spiegel2025≈ 76%
- How does the primate brain combine generative and discriminative computations in vision?James J. DiCarlo, Todd Gureckis, Ralf Haefner, Leyla Isik, Joshua Tenenbaum, Talia Konkle, Thomas Naselaris, Kimberly Stachenfeld, Zenna Tavares, Doris Tsao, Ilker Yildirim, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte Benjamin Peters2024≈ 76%
- General Mechanism of Evolution Shared by Proteins and WordsHsing-Yi Lai, Sun-Ting Tsai, Chen Siang Ng, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Shan-Jyun Wu, Meng-Xue Tsai, Yi-Ching Su, Daw-Wei Wang, and Tzay-Ming Hong Li-Min Wang2026≈ 76%
- ≈ 76%
- Emergence of sensory attenuation based upon the free-energy principleWataru Ohata, Yuichi Yamashita, Tetsuya Ogata and Jun Tani Hayato Idei2022≈ 76%
- Future of Brain Health: From Developmental Insights to Clinical TranslationMartin G Frasch, Eduardo T C\'anepa, Gerlinde A.S. Metz, Marta Cristina Antonelli, Sheehan D. Fisher and Bea R.H. Van den Bergh Mariela Chertoff2025≈ 75%
- Basic principles drive self-organization of brain-like connectivity structureValeriy A. Makarov Slizneva, and Cees van Leeuwen Carlos Calvo Tapia2024≈ 75%
- Conceptual Views of Neural Networks: A Framework for Neuro-Symbolic AnalysisJohannes Hirth and Tom Hanika2026≈ 75%
- Probabilistic Principles for Biophysics and Neuroscience: Entropy Production, Bayesian Mechanics & the Free-Energy PrincipleLancelot Da Costa2024≈ 75%
- The Free Energy Principle drives neuromorphic developmentKarl Friston, James F. Glazebrook, Michael Levin, and Antonino Marcian\`o Chris Fields2023≈ 75%
- The biogenic approach to cognitionin corpus2005≈ 75%
- ≈ 74%
- ≈ 74%
- ≈ 74%
- ≈ 73%
- Developmental Bioelectricity: the cognitive glue enabling evolutionary scaling from physiology to mindin corpus2023≈ 73%
- Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substratesin corpus2024≈ 72%
- The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognitionin corpus2019≈ 72%
- Emergence and Causality in Complex Systems: A Survey on Causal Emergence and Related Quantitative Studiesin corpus2023≈ 72%
- Learning without neurons in physical systemsin corpus2022≈ 71%
- Why Learning Requires Feelingin corpus2026≈ 71%
- The Machine Consciousness Hypothesisin corpus≈ 71%
- Cognitive glues are shared models of relative scarcities: the economics of collective intelligencein corpus2026≈ 71%
- Darwin's agential materials: evolutionary implications of multiscale competency in developmental biologyin corpus2023≈ 71%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (7)
- Developmental Bioelectricity: the cognitive glue enabling evolutionary scaling from physiology to mind
Developmental bioelectricity—the network of ion channels, gap junctions, and neurotransmitter-mediated Vmem (membrane potential) dynamics operating across all body cells, not just neurons—functions as
- Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence
Care—defined as concern for the alleviation of stress (the delta between current and optimal states)—is proposed as the substrate-independent invariant that unifies biology, Buddhist philosophy, and a
- Endless forms most beautiful 2.0: teleonomy and the bioengineering of chimaeric and synthetic organisms
Cellular collectives exhibit goal-directed competency that is substrate-independent, composition-independent, and origin-independent — a property Clawson and Levin term teleonomy — and this invariant,
- Cellular signaling pathways as plastic, proto-cognitive systems: Implications for biomedicine
- Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere: An Experimentally-Grounded Framework for Understanding Diverse Bodies and Minds
TAME—Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere—formalizes a non-binary, empirically grounded framework for recognizing, comparing, and manipulating cognition across radically diverse substrates, from
- The computational boundary of a 'self': developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition
Scale-Free Cognition, the framework introduced here, proposes that any coherent Self is demarcated by a 'cognitive light cone'—a spatio-temporal boundary of events a system can measure, model, and att
- Brains and where else? Mapping theories of consciousness to unconventional embodiments
Rouleau and Levin's 2026 analysis in *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A* (384, issue 2320) demonstrates that the functional and operational principles underlying most contemporary theo