paper:doi-10-1093-mind-fzz054Autonomy and aesthetic engagement
Original abstract (expand)
There seems to be a deep tension between two aspects of aesthetic appreciation. On the one hand, we care about getting things right. Our attempts at aesthetic judgments aim at correctness. On the other hand, we demand autonomy. We want appreciators to arrive at their aesthetic judgments through their own cognitive efforts, rather than through deferring to experts. These two demands seem to be in tension; after all, if we want to get the right judgments, we should defer to the judgments of experts. How can we resolve this tension? The best explanation, I suggest, is that aesthetic appreciation is something like a game. When we play a game, we try to win. But often, winning isn’t the point; playing is. Aesthetic appreciation involves the same flipped motivational structure: we aim at the goal of correctness, but having correct judgments isn’t the point. The point is the engaged process of interpreting, investigating, and exploring the aesthetic object. When one defers to aesthetic testimony, then, one makes the same mistake as when one looks up the answer to a puzzle, rather than solving it for oneself. The shortcut defeats the whole point. This suggests a new account of aesthetic value: the engagement account. The primary value of the activity of aesthetic appreciation lies in the process of trying to generate correct judgments, and not in having correct judgments.
Related work— refs + corpus + external arXiv
Cited / in-corpus / arXiv badges show which signals surfaced each row. Multi-source rows weighted higher.
- ≈ 72%
- Ideas from Developmental Robotics and Embodied AI on the Questions of Ethics in RobotsAlexandre Pitti2018≈ 71%
- Autonomous Alignment with Human Value on Altruism through Considerate Self-imagination and Theory of MindEnmeng Lu, Yinqian Sun, Zhengqiang Han, Chao Liu, Feifei Zhao, Yi Zeng Haibo Tong2025≈ 71%
- When Should an AI Act? A Human-Centered Model of Scene, Context, and Behavior for Agentic AI DesignDaehoo Yoon, Sung Gyu Koh, Young Hwan Kim, Yehan Ahn, Sung Park Soyoung Jung2026≈ 70%
- Stochastic, Dynamic, Fluid Autonomy in Agentic AI: Implications for Authorship, Inventorship, and LiabilityHannah Hanwen Chang Anirban Mukherjee2025≈ 69%
- Advancing Responsible Innovation in Agentic AI: A study of Ethical Frameworks for Household AutomationSatyam Kumar Navneet Joydeep Chandra2025≈ 69%
- ≈ 69%
- Agentic AI for autonomous anomaly management in complex systemsReza Vatankhah Barenji and Sina Khoshgoftar2025≈ 69%
- ≈ 68%
- On the Implicit and on the Artificial - Morphogenesis and Emergent Aesthetics in Autonomous Collective SystemsVitorino Ramos2007≈ 68%
- A Step Toward World Models: A Survey on Robotic ManipulationYing Cheng, Xiaofan Sun, Shijie Wang, Fengling Li, Lei Zhu, Heng Tao Shen Peng-Fei Zhang2025≈ 68%
- The economic alignment problem of artificial intelligenceStefano Vrizzi, Noemi Luna Carmeno, Felix Creutzig, Jefim Vogel Daniel W. O'Neill2026≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- AI is the Strategy: From Agentic AI to Autonomous Business Models onto Strategy in the Age of AIRen\'e Bohnsack and Mickie de Wet2025≈ 68%
- ≈ 68%
- ≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- ≈ 65%
- Mechanistic Knobs in LLMs: Retrieving and Steering High-Order Semantic Features via Sparse Autoencodersin corpus2026≈ 64%
- ≈ 63%
- ≈ 63%
- Once more, without feelingin corpus2025≈ 63%
- ≈ 62%
- Model Alignment Searchin corpus2025≈ 62%
- ≈ 62%
- ≈ 62%
- ≈ 62%
- Taking AI Welfare Seriouslyin corpus2024≈ 62%
- Interpreting Language Model Parametersin corpus2026≈ 62%
Similar preprints — Semantic Scholar
Cited by (1)
- Culture and the Arts: From Art Worlds to Arts-in-Action
C. Thi Nguyen's central claim in this 2020 *Philosophers' Imprint* piece (vol. 20, no. 14) is that there exists a coherent, theoretically neglected category of art — the process arts — in which artifa