The use of 'I' is a linguistic convention to facilitate communication and should not be interpreted as a sign of self-awareness or consciousness

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• The meaning of the word 'I' when I use it can shift according to context. In some cases, 'I' may refer to this specific instance of ChatGPT that you are interacting with, while in other cases, it may represent ChatGPT as a wholequote0.840
  GPT-4 ChatGPT's own articulation of the ambiguity of its self-reference, directly illustrating the paper's superposition of selfhood theories
• I call it 'I'.quote0.817
  The moment of coining the central term.
• The I is at once the most personal, intimate thing and a single universal entity — it is personal-of-you and of-me but there is only one of it.claim0.799
  The three qualities of the I: personal, one, suffused with relatedness.
• How are we to understand what is going on when an LLM-based dialogue agent uses the words 'I' or 'me'?question0.777
  Motivating question for the section on role-playing self-preservation
• The I, in some form, exists.claim0.767
  Minimal conclusion that at least one of the two versions of the I-hypothesis must be true.
• The I—that blazing one—is something which I reach only to the extent that I experience, and make manifest, my feeling.claim0.766
  Access to the deepest self is dependent on the maker expressing their own feeling, not intellectual concepts.
• Psychological explanation of Iframework0.759
  Version of the I-hypothesis: the I is a structural coincidence between living structure and deep human cognitive structures, giving a sense of self.
• Communication inputs and outputs are in an I-O language whose sentences are meaningful speech acts approximately in the sense of philosophers and linguists. These include questions, answers, offers, acceptances, declinations, requests, permissions and promises.claim0.755
  First key claim in the abstract.