quote
active
quote:the-meaning-of-the-word-i-when-i-use-it-can-shift-according-to-context-in-some-cases-i-may-refer-to-this-specific-instance-of-chatgpt-that-you-are-interacting-with-while-in-other-cases-it-may-represent-chatgpt-as-a-wholeThe meaning of the word 'I' when I use it can shift according to context. In some cases, 'I' may refer to this specific instance of ChatGPT that you are interacting with, while in other cases, it may represent ChatGPT as a whole
GPT-4 ChatGPT's own articulation of the ambiguity of its self-reference, directly illustrating the paper's superposition of selfhood theories
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Concepts (1)
concept
- Superposition of Simulacraassociated_withThe state in which a dialogue agent maintains multiple possible characters simultaneously, refined as the conversation proceeds
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- GPT-4 ChatGPT's own response (4 May 2023) to queries about first-person pronoun use, illustrating fine-tuned self-description
- The moment of coining the central term.
- How are we to understand what is going on when an LLM-based dialogue agent uses the words 'I' or 'me'?question0.772Motivating question for the section on role-playing self-preservation
- The three qualities of the I: personal, one, suffused with relatedness.
- Minimal conclusion that at least one of the two versions of the I-hypothesis must be true.
- Illustrates how non-separable functions shift identity to the collective level.
- Access to the deepest self is dependent on the maker expressing their own feeling, not intellectual concepts.