the house is a machine for living in

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• What is an appropriate definition of machine, and does it apply to all, some, or no living forms?question0.782
  Central interrogative driving the paper's entire argumentative structure.
• The notion of 'machine' used to claim living things are not machines refers to an outdated definition that no longer fits.claim0.780
  First central claim of the paper: the machine concept used in organicist critiques is historically contingent, not essential
• What is an appropriate definition of 'machine,' and does it apply to all, some, or no living forms across the tree of life?question0.778
  Foundational definitional question motivating the entire paper
• The room is to the house as the house is to the land.claim0.775
  Analogy of scales of completion and unfolding.
• Living things are not 20th-century machines, but may be 21st-century machines.claim0.771
  Core thesis: the machine metaphor requires updating, not abandoning, in light of modern machine behavior.
• It is the space which comes to life. All that we do, as architects, is then to arrange and rearrange this living space, in such a way as to intensify its life.claim0.755
  Synthetic statement that architecture is the art of awakening space.
• Machines can now make machines.claim0.753
  Evolutionary algorithms and self-organizing systems blur distinction between evolved and designed.
• In principle, a room is the sanctification and illumination of a life.quote0.751
  Distills the philosophical purpose of a room.