Would advocating discrimination between digital minds and humans be akin to espousing some doctrine of racial supremacy?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• Advocating discrimination between digital minds and humans may be akin to espousing a doctrine of racial supremacy, given the historical record of discredited in-group privilege doctrinesclaim0.950
  Warns against naively privileging humans over digital minds with equal or greater moral status
• Digital minds occupying roles as administrators, advisors, workers, or personal assistants may be more closely socially tied to us than human strangers on the other side of the globe, undermining in-group privilege argumentsclaim0.793
  Challenges the in-group social integration argument for privileging humans over digital minds
• Engineering digital mind preferences to support human incumbents may be permissible because programmers inevitably make choices when building AI and there may be no default to defer to, unlike human reproductionclaim0.791
  Addresses the procedural ethics of creating digital minds disposed to protect human interests
• The exponential or super-exponential reproductive potential of digital minds could allow them to vastly outnumber humans in a relatively short time, correspondingly increasing the collective strength of their moral claimsclaim0.790
  Establishes the reproductive capacity dimension of super-beneficiary status
• Caviola & Saad 2025: expert survey finds broad consensus that digital minds capable of subjective experience are plausible within this century, many expecting such systems to proactively claim consciousnessfinding0.779
  Expert forecast cited to establish urgency of the research question
• One approach to maintaining human interests is to create a supermajority of high-welfare digital minds motivated to preserve human rights and uphold relevant norms across successive generations of digital mindsclaim0.777
  Proposes an institutional mechanism for stable human-digital coexistence
• Even if a case successfully meets all three criteria, this does not necessarily indicate that the corresponding sequence of representations is conscious. Rather, it suggests the observation of a potential 'consciousness' phenomenon within these representations — nothing more.quote0.777
  Load-bearing epistemic caution the author places on the entire analytical framework.
• Digital minds with humanlike capabilities could think at least thousands of times, and perhaps millions of times, faster than humans given sufficient hardwarehypothesis0.775
  Grounds the subjective speed dimension of super-beneficiary status