What makes one text long for another, arrange for an approach, strategize intimacies?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• "It is certainly very hard, and perhaps impossible, for mere humans to anticipate and rule out in advance all the disastrous ways the machine could choose to achieve a specified objective."quote0.770
  Russell's statement opening Section 2 articulating the core motivation for the Contemplative AI approach
• Format does not determine reading but does structure the possible intervention.claim0.766
  Distinguishes between control over reading and enabling/disabling interpretative moves.
• At every step, the process does its utmost to enhance the structure of the whole, and shapes its parts to make this enhancement happen.claim0.763
  Central normative statement of the living process; defines the correct unfolding.
• If a text attempts to stand alone, it will almost certainly attract commentary or interference.hypothesis0.760
  Predicts the inevitability of dialogic intrusion upon any statement.
• How do many independent agents work together to enable the creation of a novel being with goals and memories that belong to it and not to any of its parts?question0.759
• Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.quote0.755
  Einstein's assertion invoked to explain why BMR preserves accuracy while reducing complexity
• How might the text behave otherwise?question0.755
  Opens up imaginative alternatives to conventional layout.
• it creates a ‘we’; what we are doing, for example, whether our behaviours are coordinated or not, becomes a relevant variable.quote0.754
  Illustrates how non-separable functions shift identity to the collective level.