question
active
question:what-is-the-full-classification-and-explanation-of-orbit-and-slider-non-fixed-point-limiting-behaviors-in-looped-transformerswhat is the full classification and explanation of orbit and slider non-fixed-point limiting behaviors in looped transformers?
Left to future work after demonstrating these behaviors are rare but not explaining their mechanism
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Hugh Blayney · Álvaro Arroyo · Johan Obando-Ceron · Pablo Samuel Castro +3
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- is stable fixed-point limiting behavior desirable or restrictive for reasoning tasks in looped transformers?question0.810Open question about whether convergence to fixed points helps or hurts reasoning performance
- Strong claim that inference stage structure is architectural rather than learned
- Limitation identified by authors: empirical results established but analytical explanation lacking
- Hypothesis replicated from Bansal et al. and Anil et al. and further investigated with norm ablations
- Evidence that stages of inference emerge without training biases from retrofitting, recurrence scheduling, or multi-recurrence losses
- Non-fixed-point limiting behaviors in looped models originally observed by Geiping et al., analyzed for frequency and impact on stages of inference
- Establishes that stages of inference are beneficial even when repeatedly applied in recurrent depth
- Pinpoints the training-time transition where fractal basins emerge.