hypothesis
active
hypothesis:input-injection-encourages-fixed-point-convergence-in-looped-transformersInput injection encourages fixed-point convergence in looped transformers
Hypothesis replicated from Bansal et al. and Anil et al. and further investigated with norm ablations
Source paper
extracted_from(2026) · Hugh Blayney · Álvaro Arroyo · Johan Obando-Ceron · Pablo Samuel Castro +3
Neighborhood — ranked by edge-count
Papers (1)
paper
Related by similarity (8)
cosine ≥ 0.65 · no typed edgeEntities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.
- Limitation identified by authors: empirical results established but analytical explanation lacking
- Transformers almost surely maintain input-injectivity throughout training, not just at initialisationhypothesis0.813Conjecture supported by Nikolaou et al. 2025 for last-token hidden states
- Replicates and extends prior findings on input injection; tested on randomly initialized 12-layer models across three norm structures
- is stable fixed-point limiting behavior desirable or restrictive for reasoning tasks in looped transformers?question0.788Open question about whether convergence to fixed points helps or hurts reasoning performance
- Pre-norm model reaches a fixed point without input injection but all layers converge to identical representations
- Left to future work after demonstrating these behaviors are rare but not explaining their mechanism
- Supports input-injectivity assumption for transformers at initialisation
- Strong claim that inference stage structure is architectural rather than learned