How should we view the prospect of being able to create super-beneficiaries in the future?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• How should we respond if we were presented with a fait accompli in which super-beneficiaries, perhaps in great numbers, have come into existence?question0.808
  Second key normative question, addressed in section 3.2
• What Kind Of Future Do We Want Toquestion0.737
• The rewarding and life-enhancing nature of work comes into focus when the thing made has life, and the makers begin to change dramatically.claim0.728
• What degree of concern and care should we exhibit toward the many diverse agents around us, and what criteria do we use to identify sentience, capacity for suffering, and other properties that have moral implications?question0.714
  Central question motivating the paper.
• Truly successful programs can only be generated; and the way forward in the next decades will be through programs which are generated through unfolding, in some fashion comparable to what I have described for buildings.hypothesis0.713
  Predicts that the only path to highly adapted software is to apply the principles of generated structure.
• Associations are made across, by recollection, probabilistically.claim0.713
  Grounds textual association in memory and chance, not fixed links.
• Is there some chance — now that these matters have been brought into the open — that this birthright may be saved, and that we can come back to what is ours again?question0.712
  Asked at the end of section 4, as a reflection on hope.
• "It is certainly very hard, and perhaps impossible, for mere humans to anticipate and rule out in advance all the disastrous ways the machine could choose to achieve a specified objective."quote0.710
  Russell's statement opening Section 2 articulating the core motivation for the Contemplative AI approach