Many views that see creating good new lives as important would regard failure to create super-beneficiaries as an existential catastrophe

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• How should we respond if we were presented with a fait accompli in which super-beneficiaries, perhaps in great numbers, have come into existence?question0.773
  Second key normative question, addressed in section 3.2
• The making of life, the making of beauty, has a profound interaction with our happiness, affecting well-being for days.claim0.762
• The goodness of the results is visible in the evident life and in the profound fact that unfolding generates an 'architecture'.claim0.757
  The dual validation of living process: life and the emergence of architectural order.
• should the universe be empty to reduce suffering, or is it best to fill it with the potential joy of consciousness in every possible embodiment — what fundamentally matters?question0.753
  Deepest cosmological question the paper raises, connecting AI ethics to fundamental questions of value
• If we were nevertheless trying to get our buildings conceived, designed, and built by the social processes which currently exist - the buildings would still inevitably break life and could not have life.hypothesis0.753
  Prediction about the incompatibility of modern processes with life.
• When I make something which has wholeness or life, I become more alive; when I make something dead, I become less alive.claim0.752
• When the process is correct, the creation of life follows almost automatically, without effort.claim0.750
• When they make things which have life and living centers in them, they experience satisfaction and healing; when they fail, they feel dejected, dull, even dead.claim0.749