How do limits of care and scope of concern become defined across agents and scales?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• What are the natural limits on an agent's sphere of concern, and can these limits be systematically expanded?question0.843
• What degree of concern and care should we exhibit toward the many diverse agents around us, and what criteria do we use to identify sentience, capacity for suffering, and other properties that have moral implications?question0.821
  Central question motivating the paper.
• The scope of states that an agent can be stressed about defines its degree of cognitive capacity.claim0.797
  Stress expands the spatial, temporal, and complexity scale of goals.
• Can Expanding Ones Care And Concern For Otherquestion0.767
• There are no a priori limits on perception of stress or corresponding capacity for care; successful stress-relief reveals novel problem spaces at different scales.claim0.763
• There are no a priori limits on a self's perceptions of stress and thus no limits on capacity for care and intelligent response.hypothesis0.761
  Predicts that collective, dynamic nature of intelligent agents enables open-ended evolution without fixed essence.
• Can Expanding Ones Cognitive Boundaries And Care Toquestion0.757
• There is no principled continuum of ethical concern that scales from simple homeostatic agents to complex metacognitive beings, allowing rational allocation of moral statusquestion0.746
  Central gap that Diverse Intelligence is proposed to fill