There are no a priori limits on a self's perceptions of stress and thus no limits on capacity for care and intelligent response.

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• There are no a priori limits on perception of stress or corresponding capacity for care; successful stress-relief reveals novel problem spaces at different scales.claim0.923
• Intelligence per se remains a mere capacity – the state of being competent with regards to noticing and overcoming stress – intelligence requires care to be engaged and expressed.claim0.825
  Distinguishing intelligence as capacity from its expression.
• A system’s capacity for care—its concern for the alleviation of homeostatic stress—can be seen as constituting its self in the absence of any permanent substance or essence.claim0.820
  Re-defines self in terms of care dynamics.
• The scope of states that an agent can be stressed about defines its degree of cognitive capacity.claim0.814
  Stress expands the spatial, temporal, and complexity scale of goals.
• If stress exceeds a system's capacity to respond, the system becomes incapacitated and care response is disabled (analogous to resistance overload in Ohm's law).hypothesis0.811
• The Stress-Care-Intelligence loop provides a perspective on Agency that does not require recourse to explanatorily burdensome notions of permanent and singular essences.claim0.802
  Asserting that the SCI loop model avoids essentialist agency.
• Stress, care, and intelligence form a single loop where care drives intelligent response to stress.claim0.801
• Stress motivates care; care produces the alleviating structure. Visual and physical sense gates are different access points to the same care manifold.claim0.794