Can we aspire to this? To Kertész's pictures?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• What can we do, if this quality is necessary for living structure, and how might we attain it in our era? Is there a new way in which we can reach the real article?question0.702
  The pragmatic, forward‑looking question about how to translate the insight into a viable contemporary practice.
• What I have shown gives a first very rough approximation to a necessary morphology of architecture.claim0.697
• A thing is beautiful to the extent that it reveals this one.claim0.696
  Definition of beauty as revelation of the I.
• How can we decide if our selection of examples is complete?question0.696
  Central question motivating attribute exploration.
• To please yourself, you may have to make a thing in which God is visible.claim0.692
  The troubling consequence of true self-pleasing: it produces beauty so deep it reveals the divine, which makes modern people uncomfortable.
• The unassuming, ordinary, touching quality can only be created by a living process, by unfolding.claim0.689
  Strong exclusivity claim: only unfolding produces genuine ordinariness that touches people.
• When we find out the things we really like, we are also more in touch with all that is.claim0.687
  Final point suggesting that deep liking connects us with universal reality.
• But even so, although it is the most naked and forceful artistic act, this too must be seen as an unfolding which uses nothing but the fundamental process.claim0.686
  Reconciles the brutal imposition with the unfolding paradigm — it is still the fundamental process, just at its most forceful