Are there non-iterative processes that can effectively explore a Vast state space of possibilities?

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• If processes are in use which have these attributes, then we may have the real possibility of a living world.hypothesis0.794
  Conditional statement linking the adoption of morphogenetic processes to the emergence of a living world.
• We evaluate the relative life of a process by making predictions based on thought-experiments or simulations.claim0.785
• I believe such a system of living processes can be described precisely, can be made practical, and can be implemented.claim0.784
  Alexander's optimistic programmatic statement for a worldwide generative system.
• Living processes are necessarily generative: large precedes small, and the whole creates the conditions for the part.claim0.779
• "We could continue to invent new and exciting mechanisms beyond context-orientation and Worlds, ad absurdum, or recognise they are all just points within a dimensionally unbounded space of related, self-similar mechanisms."concept0.775
  Claim that many advanced programming paradigms reduce to parameterizations of the n-way associative model.
• Instead of using plans, designs, and so on, I shall argue that we MUST instead use generative processes.claim0.773
  The central argumentative claim of Book 2, positioned against conventional design.
• The process itself is to be part of nature.claim0.771
• The process to design for is not stability or predictability, but promoting natural processesclaim0.771
  Key design philosophy of the talk, rejecting engineered stability in favor of dynamic, process-driven restoration.