The process to design for is not stability or predictability, but promoting natural processes

Entities in the same semantic neighborhood but without a typed relation to this one — candidates for new edges or unrecognized duplicates.

• It is, ultimately, the process, not the design, which gives life to a building.claim0.835
  Emphasizes process over blueprint.
• The design problem is redefined not around building a structure to last, but promoting processesclaim0.818
  Assertion from the NRCS specification sheet that LTPBR shifts focus from structural permanence to process promotion.
• If design and construction processes are living processes, each part will become itself, adapted to local conditions and individual people.claim0.812
  Core assertion that living process translates unique place and person into unique form.
• A living process is always natural, similar to the best kind of natural process, but it goes deeper and includes additional centers that naive natural process may miss.claim0.809
  Positions living process as an refined version of innate human creativity, not an artificial imposition.
• The process itself is to be part of nature.claim0.808
• The process of design is an empirical matter: which step has the deepest feeling can be discovered by experiment in the real place or in simulations.claim0.806
  Defines the experimental, empirical nature of deciding next steps.
• The issue is not whether the process will produce living structure if done faithfully — it will — but whether the maker has the stamina and will to keep rejecting versions that lack life.claim0.805
  Alexander's claim that the limiting factor in creating living structure is not method but the maker's persistence.
• process, not designconcept0.803
  The idea that the life of a building comes from the process of its creation, not from a preconceived design on paper.